 |
|
|
Carlos Monsiváis
"Leaving future generations with the right to breathe once
every three days" |
|
By Pilar Franco *
MEXICO CITY - Many
in Mexico agree that it is impossible to categorize writer Carlos
Monsiváis, but he defines himself as "a reader".
Regardless, his active participation in an array of cultural, social
and political movements in this country has made him a privileged
witness of contemporary history.
Among his many facets, his work as an implacable
analyst and critic has turned Monsiváis into a point of reference.
"We live as if future generations would
only have the right to breathe every three days," the winner
of the 2001 Anagrama International Essay Prize said in a conversation
with Tierramérica, referring to the environmental scars left
by military conflicts.
Also a journalist, he was born in the Mexican
capital in 1938, has written several books of poetry and of the
most varied topics of Mexican pop culture.
Q: What would you consider a successful battle in the "war
against the war" that has been launched by societies around
the world?
A: The great victory would be the creation of a global citizenry,
one that emerges simultaneously in all parts of the world, under
the principle stimulus of information. There was minimal effort
to coordinate the two major marches in many cities and countries
(in February and March). Resulting in what could be called "joint
intuition" or an organic will that does not come from political
parties or assemblies, enormous contingents that have demonstrated
against the war, acquiring along the way an international knowledge
and informed solidarity. This is the first great battle won against
indifference, fear of finding out. The second great battle is the
certainty that it is impossible to accept that only one country,
and a tiny group in that country, as owners of the fundamental decisions
on the planet. The third great battle is the importance of information.
Frequently via the Internet, through avid readership and obsessive
consumption of news, it is now understood why information is power,
not to halt the war but to say that ignorance and frustration can
no longer be a pretext.
Q: Are poets, writers and artists building
a global reference point for the peace cause?
A: Poets, writers and artists have had multiple participation in
the opposition to the war. The role of artists has stood out most
because they are inevitably the most well known. And there was the
wonderful effort of staging the Aristophanes play "Lysistrata"
on the same day in so many countries. However, the core of the mobilizations
has been the young people, the great generational rebirth of the
democratic struggles. It is exciting to see the commitment of young
people who were thought to be isolated forever on some reality show.
Q: Do you think an environmental security
treaty prohibiting harm to the natural surroundings would also serve
to hone a global anti-war policy?
A: The government of George W. Bush, typically, refused to sign
the Kyoto Protocol (on climate change), proving -- even before the
war -- his absolute and brutal indifference to the planet. Of course
an environmental security agreement is indispensable, but it runs
counter to the interests of the big transnationals that the U.S.
government so unrelentingly serves.
Q: Why do you think so little
concern was expressed about the ecological harm caused by recent
wars?
A: We haven't incorporated ecological awareness among our daily
duties. We live as if future generations only had the right to breathe
on every third day. Governments, not wanting to upset the big capitalists,
do not recognize all of the environmental catastrophes (a good example
of this is the series of governments in Mexico). Society worries
about its children but not about the ecosystems they are destined
to inhabit.
Q: According to the Bush perspective,
preserving the environment cannot be part of an energy policy. Is
conserving energy and using it efficiently up to government leaders?
A: Of course not, but so far issues like energy policies have not
been electoral issues. It is up to non-governmental organizations,
political parties and society as a whole to politicize the issue
-- in the good sense of the word.
* Pilar Franco is a Tierramérica
contributor.
|