 |
|
|
French Plan Contradicts Europe's Anti-Nuclear Trend |
|
By Julio Godoy *
France
is to invest 150 billion dollars in nuclear reactors, a move that
distances the country from the renewable energy goals of its neighbors.
PARIS - The French government plans to earmark
150 billion dollars over the next 30 years for nuclear power plants,
including the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER),
despite experts' warnings on technological and environmental problems.
ITER was conceived in the 1980s as a cooperation project for civilian
use of nuclear energy, with the participation of the European Union,
China, Japan, South Korea, the former Soviet Union and the United
States.
Later, France told the EU it would double its contribution to the
reactor, whose cost for the next 10 years reach 12 billion dollars,
in exchange for building it in Cadarache, in the southern part of
the country.
Over the past 18 months, China, Russia and the EU agreed to that
proposal, and Paris convinced the European bloc to launch the project
even without the participation of the United States or Japan, the
latter of which also offered to build the reactor in its territory.
In the context of France's opposition to the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq, the location of ITER turned into a completely political matter.
In late November, the European Commission (the executive arm of
the EU) announced that it was willing to finance ITER alone and
to build it in Cadarache, and gave the non-European participants
until the end of 2004 to decide whether they would remain as partners
in the project.
ITER seeks to emulate nuclear fusion of two hydrogen isotopes (deuterium
and tritium) that occurs in stars, and produce helium with massive
generation of electricity.
French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Rafarin said in November 2003
that the project would provide ''the energy of the future, an inexhaustible
source and with no significant problems, thanks to the abundance
of hydrogen contained in water.''
Scientific data, however, contradict the prime minister's statements.
Deuterium indeed is abundant in nature, but tritium, which is radioactive,
is very scarce and unstable.
The French nuclear physicists Sebastien Balibar, Yves Pomeau and
Jacques Treiner wrote in the Oct. 25, 2004 edition of Le Monde newspaper
that a thermonuclear reactor poses three technical problems of first
magnitude: the production of the elements to undergo fusion, their
resistance to fusion, and control of this reaction.
However, they say, the ITER project is only interested in the last,
''and ignores the other two, the solution of which, nevertheless,
is essential.''
To generate a gigawatt of electricity, a nuclear fusion reactor
would have to burn 56 kg of tritium, but ITER does not see a problem
in producing that isotope, nor in handling the nuclear waste generated,
said the scientists.
Similar doubts are caused by another major French nuclear project:
updating the country's 57 nuclear plants, replacing them with pressurized
water reactors, or EPR (European Pressurized Reactors).
In late October, Electricité de France (EdF), the state electricity
monopoly, announced that it would begin construction in 2007 of
the first EPR in Flamanville, on the country's northwest Atlantic
coast, and that it is expected to be operational by 2012, at a cost
of four to five billion dollars.
France's current nuclear power facilities will be obsolete in 2020,
and replacing half of them with EPR before then would cost some
150 billion dollars.
France produces 80 percent of its energy in nuclear power plants,
and is second in the world in terms of dependence on atomic energy,
after Ukraine.
Currently, the only European countries with plans to build new nuclear
plants are France, Finland and some of the former socialist bloc
nations.
Belgium, Germany and Sweden are among the European countries, in
contrast, that have begun the gradual dismantling of their nuclear
reactors. France is one of the few absent from the campaign to achieve
21 percent renewable energy in each EU country by 2010.
The proportion of renewable energy in France today is less than
15 percent and the country ''should already be producing 7,000 megawatts
from wind energy, but barely produces 300,'' Hélène Gassin, of Greenpeace-France,
told Tierramérica.
Construction of the first EPR ''will contribute to the energy independence
of France, and will serve as a window for exporting this (French
and German) technology,'' says EdF president Pierre Gadonneix.
But the director of the anti-nuclear association Sortir du Nucléaire,
Stephane Lhomme, said in a Tierramérica interview that ''there is
practically no EPR operating in the world, and there are only three
being built,'' meaning there are no ''objective guarantees of the
efficiency of that technology.''
Furthermore, the nuclear plants with EPR would have to operate 60
years without interruption in order to ensure profits, and the authorities
have admitted that these facilities were not designed to withstand
terrorist attacks or earthquakes, Lhomme said.
* Julio Godoy is an IPS correspondent.
|